Primary data is information that was gathered by an individual for a specific reason. It includes things like surveys, questionnaires, and accounts of an event from people who were there. It is known for how accurate it is and how much more it costs than secondary data.
Primary data is the data that is collected first, before it is analysed, sorted, or put into a table. It was good because it was pure and simple. The downsides of collecting primary data are that it takes time and money, and it needs to be able to stand on its own as a resource.
The benefit of having more power When a researcher collects primary data, he or she can focus on the parts that are important to the study and leave out the parts that aren’t. This makes it easier to gather evidence for a theory or cause. By keeping the research tight in this way, anyone who might later question the validity of the study will have less room to do so.
What’s good about a small set of data When a small set of data is enough, it takes less time to analyse primary data. It does, however, take longer to collect. The time savings start when it’s time to analyse, sort, and put together a report from the primary data. This makes it perfect for a small-scale study or pilot survey.
Cost is a bad thing about primary data It costs more to get first-hand information than to get information from other sources. This is because first-hand information is often published in journals and magazines that can be read online for free. Getting first-hand information takes more time and work than getting second-hand information. It can also take more time to sort through primary data to look for mistakes or inconsistencies in the research or results. People act differently when they know they are being watched, which also affects the results.
Why being biassed and not being honest are bad When surveys, interviews, questionnaires, and focus groups are used to get information, bias and dishonesty could be a problem. The researcher or the people being asked questions can be biassed. If the people being interviewed think the questions are too personal, they might choose not to answer or give false answers to get the interview over with and protect their privacy. Also, people may choose to answer a written survey in a way that makes them look better. When people talk about things in focus groups, one or two people with strong personalities can change the results.
The Bad Things About Being First It can be dangerous for a researcher to be the first one to study and report on a subject. This is because there is no way to compare the results to something else if they are skewed, wrong, or even just questionable. This makes it even more important to make sure that the data collected is correct and that the methods for collecting it are well thought out. If, for example, surveys are used to get first-hand information, it’s important that the questions are well-written. Most surveys don’t give people a second chance to give feedback, so questions that are too narrow make it harder to get accurate results.
