Why the WHO got caught between China and Trump

Why the WHO got caught between China and Trump
Written by admin
Why the WHO got caught between China and Trump

Why the WHO bought caught between China and Trump

WHO HQ GenevaPicture copyright

Picture caption

The WHO headquarters in Geneva

President Donald Trump has mentioned he’s going to halt US funding to the World Well being Group (WHO) as a result of it had “failed in its fundamental obligation” in its response to the coronavirus outbreak.

However what’s the WHO and what does it do?

It is the worldwide well being HQ

A wash of color overhead greets anybody getting into the WHO headquarters in Geneva the place the 194 flags of the organisation’s member states drape from the ceiling as – on sunny days, at the least – beams of sunshine flood the big open atrium.

That is from the place the worldwide response to what’s been described as “the best check to the world since World Conflict Two”- is being co-ordinated.

The UN company was based in 1948, and describes itself because the “international guardian of public well being”.

Its said objective is to make sure “the best attainable degree of well being for all folks”.

It is a massive job.

During the last 11 years, it has overseen the worldwide response to 6 worldwide well being emergencies, together with the Ebola outbreak in west Africa in 2014, the Zika outbreak in 2016 and – proper now – the Covid-19 pandemic.

It additionally

  • decides when to sound the “international alarm” throughout outbreaks
  • units up worldwide analysis and growth plans geared toward fast-tracking new therapies and vaccines
  • sends specialists into the epicentres of illness with the intention to collect information on what works and what would not

The WHO additionally has accountability for a variety of different well being points, together with

  • tackling the worldwide weight problems and diabetes epidemics
  • lowering deaths on the roads
  • wiping out vaccine-preventable illnesses, reminiscent of polio
  • working to cut back the variety of moms and infants who die throughout childbirth.

However – and it is a massive however – the WHO is an advisory-only physique. It might make suggestions to international locations on what to do to enhance the well being of its residents and forestall the outbreak of illness, however it could actually’t implement these suggestions.

Has the WHO mishandled this pandemic?

It is dependent upon who you ask.

When you ask Donald Trump, the reply is a convincing sure.

However Mr Trump himself is dealing with withering criticism of how he has handled the outbreak within the US – which now has greater than 600,000 instances and 26,000 deaths.

He additionally has a much bigger geopolitical battle with China, which far precedes Covid-19.

  • Truth-checking Trump’s claims in regards to the WHO
  • The Ethiopian on the coronary heart of the coronavirus battle

Nonetheless, the US chief is definitely not the primary to criticise the WHO for its effusive reward of China’s response to the outbreak which continued even whereas others – together with medics within the nation – described how their early issues in regards to the virus had been silenced by the authorities.

Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director normal of the WHO, has repeatedly mentioned he stands by his reward of China.

He says its response helped sluggish the unfold of the virus internationally, shopping for different international locations time to arrange for what was coming.

And he, together with many different scientists, factors out that China voluntarily shared the genetic code of the virus in a short time, permitting international locations to begin making diagnostic exams and dealing on vaccines.

Nonetheless, there has additionally been widespread criticism of the nation’s response.

Devi Sridhar, professor of worldwide public well being on the College of Edinburgh, mentioned: “China did not do an excellent job of telling the world [about the early stages of the outbreak] and it is clear there have been delays.

“They tried to downplay this within the early days.”

Prof Sridhar investigated the WHO’s much-criticised response to the west Africa Ebola epidemic, and describes herself as one of many WHO’s “harshest critics”.

However she added: “It is arduous to fault a variety of what the WHO has been making an attempt to do, given the tough balancing act of making an attempt to get international locations to handle this epidemic and take it critically, whereas additionally making an attempt to maintain all international locations on the desk.”

A serious a part of the WHO’s function is diplomacy. As a result of it could actually’t drive international locations to share details about outbreaks, it depends on nations themselves coming ahead.

Prof Sridhar mentioned the organisation might have gotten its “5 minutes of fame” all over the world if Dr Tedros had issued a powerful condemnation of China, she says, however that might have hampered the worldwide response to Covid-19.

“What would which have achieved? He nonetheless wants to return per week later and ask China to share information.”

She believes the WHO did put stress on China to be extra up-front within the early days of the outbreak – however that it did so behind the scenes.

“I believe there is a massive distinction in diplomacy, between doing issues publicly with the media – which is usually only a efficiency, to make a posture – and to do issues privately and truly advocate and get issues shifting.”

What occurred in earlier outbreaks?

This is not the primary time the WHO has confronted criticism.

Picture copyright
Getty Pictures

Picture caption

The WHO was criticised for its “sluggish” response to the outbreak of Ebola in west Africa

The UN company was deemed to be sluggish to answer the 2014 Ebola outbreak, declaring a world emergency solely 5 months after the virus was first recognized in Guinea.

However in 2009, it was accused of the alternative – being fast to over-react on the H1N1 swine-flu outbreak, and unnecessarily declaring a worldwide pandemic.

Final week, when President Trump floated the concept of withholding funding to the WHO, Dr Tedros referred to as for international locations to not “politicise this virus.”

He additionally mentioned he welcomed a overview of the WHO’s response to the outbreak as a result of “we wish to study from our errors, from our strengths and transfer ahead”.

However he mentioned the main target now ought to be on “preventing this virus”.

What impression might President Trump’s transfer have?

The US is the most important single donor to the WHO, which depends on a mix of members’ charges – based mostly on wealth and inhabitants – and voluntary contributions.

These voluntary donations make up a lot of the company’s $2.2bn (£1.75bn) annual price range.

Final 12 months the US gave greater than $400m.

Dr Jeremy Farrar, director of the UK’s Wellcome Belief, mentioned the WHO wants “extra assets, not much less” to deal with the pandemic.

“We face the best problem of our lifetime. No different organisation can do what they do.

“It is a time for solidarity, not division.”

And Prof Sridhar mentioned the US was “chopping off its nostril to spite its face”.

“If WHO is hampered by this – its potential to answer Covid, but in addition to malaria, and TB and polio is hampered, too – we’ll see the resurgence of all types of illnesses that we thought had been up to now.”

#caught #China #Trump

About the author